JimB's blog post as a potential source for a blog templateThis is a featured page

Jim is commenting in blue.
Harry's thoughts in orange


My plan after talking with Patrick and reading the email was to make this page two part. The first part would more properly be the template or guide. The second part (which actually needn't be here if people don't think it important, would be an example of a blog following that recipe, specifically, mine. I didn't mean for mine to BE the template. Before we broke for the night, we got my blog up here to be used for that purpose but no further. Harry then added his commentary which is quite useful, but I may confuse things a bit by adding the template Guide portions above teh section he commented on. Such is life.
===== Template/Guide =====

Here are a few recommendations an resources for blogging about the USA PATRIOT Act and the actions being taken regarding it in the Congress and by the Net Roots. Each of us blogs differently and our readers have different expectations of us, so no one formula will fit us all, but here are some thoughts to get the ball rolling.

In terms of resources, Get FISA Right has a page just chock full of links, videos, and the like. It can be found at http://get-fisa-right.wetpaint.com/page/JUSTICE+Act+Blogger+resources. The example blog below took its resources and much of its information from that page and those it links to.

I'm about to call it a night. I'm still fighting a pretty bad infection, and am running out of steam. Tomorrow, Patrick and I were planning on expanding this. I'm also planning on finishing and posting my blog to all my usual sites. The outline below is intended as a superset outline of a great many possible blogs. I want to make each place holder a concise description of a paragraph or section of a blog post, perhaps citing resources and perhaps citing solid quotes or pithy talking points.

[The Intro, hook or Tease]
[What's going on now]
[The myths]
[The facts]
[The bills]
[The amendments]
[The background]
[The laws and the acts or procedures they allow]
[National Security Letters]
[Sneak and Peek]
[Roving "John Doe" warrants]
["Lone Wolf"]
[Section 215 Orders]
[Secrecy and gag orders]
[Grass roots actions]
[The coalition:]
[Get FISA Right]
[The EFF]
[The ACLU]
[The call to action]

Having done the above I was then planning on saying the following example was written by one of ourt members using these resources and that while it is suitable to the author's audience, each blogger needs to build their own.

===== Example =====

Fix the USA PATRIOT Act

In the last couple of weeks very important things have been going on in the realm of Civil Liberties, and our concern for issues like Health Care, Iran, Afghanistan and the Chicago bid for the Olympics have distracted us from it. And it is not going well. You can help. Help put pressure on the US Senate and House of Representatives to put important protections of the rights of "US persons", our citizens and resident aliens into the law as it is renewed.

I don't think this intro is needed in the template. This is great to have in a blog post trying to convince a blogger to write about this issue---like Jim's post is in general. However, the template is about making it very easy to write a post, not to explicitly convince them to write it. Much more important than advocating for a post is showing them how they make that post.

If you listen to Fox News, "Some on the Left" or "Some Democrats" want to strip the federal government of critical powers to protect us from terrorists. Unfortunately, as they are making these claims in defense of the USA PATRIOT Act, they get most of the facts wrong. Julian Sanchez of the CATO Institute has a video and blog posting that tears their coverage apart.

This paragraph also contains aspects trying to convince someone to write the post rather than making it easy. Also, we generally can't be reliant on someone watching a video in the template. Rather, we explain specifically yet concisely what is in a video, and then we even provide the embed code to them in a copy/paste format if we want. We also would need to specifically explain why they should include this video in particular in their post.

So what is really going on? If the Democrats aren't trying to completely eliminate valuable anti-terrorist tools, what has been happening the last two weeks?

We shouldn't phrase this in a hypothetical. Remember what Marcy said---these people need to be shamed. Let's just put it out there exactly what the democrats are doing as explicitly and directly as we can.

First of all, several sections of the USA PATRIOT Act are up for re-authorization, because they were passed with a "sunset clause" that makes them expire at the end of the year. According to even official Inspector General reports from both administrations, the Patriot act has lead to substantial abuse of US Citizens constittution rights. In response to these abuses Senators Feingold and Durbin introduced an act called the "JUSTICE Act". "JUSTICE, like "USA PATRIOT" is a goofy acronym, in this case standing for "Judicious Use of Surveillance Tools In Counterterrorism Efforts. Note that while I'll call the acronym goofy, but the act itself is far from that. It basically insures that a number of these special powers authorized in the USA PATRIOT Act and other post-9/11 legislation are only used against terrorism, that the government has to establish a connection to terrorists in order to use "John Doe roving wire taps", "sneak and peek" secret searches, "National Security Letters" and other prodecures.

This paragraph is also framed as explaining what the JUSTICE act is to a blogger, rather than making it easy for them to use this information. This is also very wonky, and I think that only very serious civil liberties bloggers will go this deep. We need to think broader than that in our outreach. Plus, Kevin specified on the call that we shouldn't focus specifically on advocating for JUSTICE any more. I think this template post is more about shaming Leahy and the other Dems as Marcy described than going into the weeds of policy.


A broad coalition supported the JUSTICE Act. Senator Leahy, however, submitted his own bill that offered fewer limitations and protections and the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC), which Leahy heads, decided to use it as a starting point. Many of us started to agitate to get pieces of the JUSTICE Act supported as amendments to the Leahy bill. The evening before the bill was taken up by the committee, Diane Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee made a deal with Leahy. An even weaker bill that she largely wrote, and which he cosponsored, replaced the Leahy bill as the starting point. Only a small amount of work happened on that bill last Thursday, before it was postponed until this coming Thursday, due to conflicts caused by the Senate also doing markup on the Health Care bill which was drawing Senators away.

Resources: Comparisons of the JUSTICE Act and Leahy's bill from Center for Democracy and Technology, Julian Sanchez on Cato@Liberty, and Marcy Wheeler on Emptywheel.
Resources: Reactions to last week's SJC meeting from the EFF, the ACLU, David Kravetz, Wired's Threat Level

And that brings us to this week and Thursday's coming second round of markup on the bill. We, that is grass roots civil libertarians, Get FISA Right, the ACLU, the EFF and others, would like you as citizens, as bloggers, as Facebook and Twitter users to make you voices heard. We'd like you to blog, tweet and write about this effort in order to get as many people as possible involved, and for all of you and them to bring pressure to bear on your senators, especially if one of your senators sits on the Judiciary Committee, and your Congressmen and any other Senators and Congressmen you may support, contribute to or know, to do the right thing. To work for and support amendments, whether they come from the JUSTICE Act or other sources that restrict the circumstances and the purposes under which these powers can be used.

Why? Well, I started out bashing Fox coverage on this, let me now shift to praising one Fox commentator and recommending that you listen to his highly knowledgeable and impassioned speech against the USA PATRIOT Act and National Security Letters. Please watch Judge Andrew Napolitano's speech on "Natural Rights and The Patriot Act", shown here. His explanations of the history of our Constitution, laws and the abuses of citizens' rights regarding the USA PATRIOT Act and National Security letters are well worth listening to whether your politics are left, right or center. I recommend watching all three parts.

As ever, I don't want you to just believe what I say. I want you to read and listen and learn. Form your own opinions. I've included a number of links to pertinent resources in the posting above and the two videos. Get FISA Right has a resource page with more links and more calls to action. Please read there. Join us when several of us live blog during the hearings on Thursday. If you agree with us sign and retweet our Twitter petitions. Blog about what you believe, but above all, be a Free Voice. Be a voice for freedom.

Resources: Our Twitter Petition: "@RussFeingold and @SenDurbin, thanks for your tireless efforts to reform the #patriotact http://act.ly/kn (please RT)"
Resources: Get FISA Right's "How to help bring JUSTICE to the PATRIOT Act" page.
Resources: Get FISA Right's "JUSTICE Act blogger resources" page.
Resources: <live blog schedule goes here>
[I think this is
Marcy Wheeler at Emptywheel
Jim Burrows at Daily Kos
Someone else at Somewhere else
and that we will all be watching the same twitter feed, perhaps through the Twazzup gadget on the get-fisa-right.wetpaint.com home page.]

Vox Libertas,
Jim Burrows



Brons
Brons
Latest page update: made by Brons , Oct 7 2009, 1:24 AM EDT (about this update About This Update Brons Edited by Brons


view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: blog Justice Act Patriot Act
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
Anonymous fashion edhardy caps 0 Dec 9 2009, 10:44 PM EST by Anonymous
 
Thread started: Dec 9 2009, 10:44 PM EST  Watch
top edhardy caps www.lookedhardy.com
Do you find this valuable?    
Anonymous fashion edhardy caps 0 Dec 3 2009, 3:03 AM EST by Anonymous
 
Thread started: Dec 3 2009, 3:03 AM EST  Watch
top edhardy caps www.lookedhardy.com
Do you find this valuable?    

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


Showing 2 of 2 threads for this page

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)